Paper critique Estimation of effective fracture volume in gas wells

PAPER CRITIQUE 5

Papercritique: Estimation of effective fracture volume in gas wells

Abstract

Thispaper presents an article review of the “Estimation ofEffective-Fracture Volume Using Water- Flow back and Production Datafor Shale-Gas Wells” by Ahmad Alkouh, Steven McKetta, and RobertWattenbarger.

Thearticle “Estimation of Effective-Fracture Volume Using Water-Flowback and Production Data for Shale-Gas Wells” by Ahmad Et aladdresses the problem of ignoring water production in the analysisand forecast of the shale-gas well performance. The researchchallenge being addressed is the failure to incorporate waterproduction study in the analyzing and forecasting of shale-gas-wellperformance and whether it is beneficial.

of the paper

Itis evident from the article that water production data is usuallyignored in the analysis of shale-gas reservoirs. This paper shows thebenefits of including water production in the analysis. Itdemonstrates how the use of a new method that combines water flowback and long-term water production data in the analysis of shale-gastogether with its benefits. The method is more effective, unlike theprevious methods. The conductive fracture networks allow the flow ofgas from the matrix to the wellbore and are known as effectivefracture volume and can assume different shapes (Wattenbarger &ampAlkouh, 2013). It is, therefore, necessary to include flow back datain the analysis of shale-gas-wells.

Critique

Theauthors were precise to come up with a logical structure that is veryeasy to follow. The grammar is clear without tense or spellingmistakes. Formulas used have been clearly explained through use ofeasy to follow steps and examples. They were sure to incorporate dataclearly with the effective use of tables and graphs. The assumptionbeing put forth is reasonable and of great help to the gas industryas evidenced by the findings from the data. The length of the paperis appropriate because it has been able to present their data andfindings without leaving out critical information.

Conclusion

Inmost cases, flow back data is not put into consideration whenanalyzing and forecasting shale-gas-well performance. This isimportant as discussed by the paper because it clearly shows itsbenefits. The paper was a success because it helped bring out clearlythe effects of ignoring flow back data in the analysis ofshale-gas-wells. Its benefit in the gas industry has been presentedwith precision. Clearly identified regimes are obtainable incircumstances when flow back data is used in the analysis ofshale-gas-wells.

Reference

Wattenbarger,R. &amp Alkouh, A. (2013). New Advances in Shale Reservoir AnalysisUsing Flow Back Data. Paper presented at the SPE Eastern RegionalMeeting, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA.